PSY 448 Clinical Neuropsychology Last revised: Oct 21, 2025
Executive Functions & Tests
What are executive functions and how do neuropsychologists assess them with individuals who have suffered brain damage?
In a comprehensive review, Diamond (2013, Abstract) argues that there are three core executive functions (EFs):
- Inhibition = (1) response inhibition (self control, resisting temptations, resisting acting impulsively) and (2) interference control (selective attention and cognitive inhibition)
- Inhibition “involves being able to control one’s attention, behavior, thoughts, and/or emotions to override a strong internal predisposition or external lure, and instead do what’s more appropriate or needed” (Diamond, 2013, p. 137)
- Working Memory (WM) = “involves holding information in mind and mentally working with it (or said differently, working with information no longer perceptually present)…The two types of WM are distinguished by content—verbal WM and nonverbal (visual-spatial) WM” (Diamond, 2013, p. 142)
- Note that Inhibition and WM both support each other.
- Cognitive Flexibility = creatively thinking "out of the box," seeing things from different perspectives, and quickly and flexibly adapting to changed circumstances.
- One aspect of cognitive flexibility is being able to change perspectives spatially (e.g., “What would this look like if I viewed it from a different direction?”) or interpersonally (e.g., “Let me see if I can see this from your point of view”)" (Diamond, 2013, p. 149)
- “Cognitive flexibility also involves being flexible enough to adjust to changed demands or priorities, to admit you were wrong, and to take advantage of sudden, unexpected opportunities” (Diamond, 2013, p. 149)
- Cognitive flexibility depends upon both Inhibition and WM
Higher-Order EFs
- Diamond (2013) argues that three “higher-order” executive functions build upon the core functions. These are (1) Reasoning, (2) Problem-Solving, and (3) Planning. The notion of “Fluid Intelligence” reflects both Reasoning and Problem-Solving” (p. 152, Fig. 4)
Some of the approaches or methods of assessment of executive functions by neuropsychologists are listed below. Note that this list is selective and by no means exhaustive.
Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS, 2001)
Edith Kaplan, Ph.D. (1924-2009) was one of the most important pioneers in modern clinical neuropsychology. She worked in the Boston area for her whole professional life beginning in the 1950s at Boston University's School of Medicine, the Boston Veterans Administration Hospital, and Suffolk University. She was widely consulted on a variety of cases, e.g., when John Hinckley attempted to assassinate President Reagan in March of 1981, Kaplan was asked to do a full neuropsychological assessment of the defendant (he was found not guilty by reason of insanity for his crime, but spent over 30 years in public hospital settings before being released in 2016). Considered the "mother of clinical neuropsychology, the irrepressible Edith Kaplan died at age 85 (Delis, 2010).
Dean Delis, Ph.D. was a pre- and post-doctoral intern working with Kaplan at the Boston VA Hospital in the 1970s and later her collaborator in developing the D-KEFS. He worked for many years on the faculty of the UCSD School of Medicine from which he retired. He continues the practice of clinical neuropsychology as a private clinician.
A nationally standardized battery of 9 tests which evaluate a broad range of EFs. As Patterson (2013) summarizes, the D-KEFS consists of the following instruments which can be used either individually or as a test battery. (Note a revised D-KEFS-2 is under preparation, but as of October 2023 has not yet been published).
1. Trail Making Test (Flexibility of thinking; not the older Trails A & B, but similar)
- 5 forms/conditions
- Conditions: (1) mark only the 3s, (2) connect the numbers, (3) connect the letters, (4) connect numbers and letters numerically and alphabetically, (5) follow the dotted line and draw a line as neatly as possible.
2. Verbal Fluency Test (Fluent productivity in the verbal domain)
- Condition 1: given a letter of the alphabet, name as many words (but NOT names, places, or numbers) in 60 secs.
- Condition 2: Name as many animals in 60 sec. and, then, as many boys’ names in 60 secs.
- Condition 3: Name as many fruits and furniture in 60 sec. while switching between two categories when responding
3. Design Fluency Test (Fluent productivity in the spatial domain)
- On a response form, connect dots and then make as many different designs with using only a specified number of lines
4. Color-Word Inference Test (Verbal inhibition; based on the original Stroop Test presented further below)
- Condition 1: shown color blocks, say the colors in order
- Condition 2: shown words, read them in order (e.g., green, red, red, green, blue)
- Condition 3: words are printed in colors, but examines must name the color of the ink and not the word
- Condition 4: words and words in boxes: read the word not in the boxes, but report the color of the ink of words in the boxes
5. Sorting Test (Problem-solving, verbal and spatial concept formation, flexibility of thinking on a conceptual task)
- Condition 1: With 6 mixed up cards (each with a word and a picture), sort the cards into two groups
- Condition 2: With the same cards sorted by the examiner, the examinee must identify what categorization rule was used.
![]()
6. Word Context Test (Deductive reasoning, verbal abstract thinking; see figure above on left)
- Given a made-up word (in context), examinee must determine what it means
- 10 items, each of which has 5 clue sentences
7. Tower Test (Planning & reasoning in spatial modality; impulsivity; variation of the “Tower of Hanoi” task used with Patient H.M. and others; see figure above on right)
- Given rules about the discs that construct the towers
- Examinee must make the tower and discs look like a picture in the stimulus book
- Create the picture in the fewest number of moves
8. Twenty Questions (Hypothesis testing, verbal & spatial abstract thinking, impulsivity)
- Shown a page that has 30 pictures, the examiner chooses a picture and the examinee must ask the least number of yes/no questions to determine what picture the examiner chose
9. Proverbs Test (Metaphorical thinking; generating versus comprehending abstract thought)
- Condition 1: proverbs are read and examinee asked to interpret orally
- Condition 2: same proverbs are presented, but examinee must choose among 4 options as the one which best describes the proverb.
- Examples of proverbs
- "The squeaky wheel gets the grease”
- “When in Rome, do as the Romans do”
- “A bad workman always blames his tools”
- “A rolling stone gathers no moss”
- “A stitch in time saves nine”
Some other approaches to evaluating EVs include the following:
1. Abstract Concepts & Shifting Cognitive Set
Wisconsin Card Sort Test (WCST)
- Originally published in 1948. An online computer version of the test is also available.
- The WCST assesses the following executive functions (Silva-Filho et al. 2007)
![]()
- Cognitive Flexibility: The ability to shift mental sets and adapt to changing rules or environmental feedback.
- Abstract Reasoning: The ability to form concepts and think abstractly.
- Planning and Organization: The capacity to develop and execute a plan to achieve a goal.
- Working Memory: The ability to hold and manipulate information in the mind, such as the "failure to maintain set" indicator.
- Perseveration: The tendency to repeat a previous response even after the rules have changed.
- Self-Monitoring: The ability to monitor one's own behavior and correct errors
- Four “target” cards are placed on table: 1 red triangle, 2 green stars, 3 yellow crosses, and 4 blue circles.
- Examinee is presented with a stack of cards (a total of 128) and told to place each of them below the proper or right target card. Examiner will only tell them if they are “right” or “wrong”.
- Examinee has choice of category: color, number, or shape.
- First criterion: color. Then changed to number, then to shape. But, the examinee is not told that the criterion has changed.
- After the examinee has gotten 10 correct placements, the examiner changes the criterion to a new one.
2. Goal Formulation (Volition [Lezak et al., 2012])
- This function refers to the ability of a person to know what s/he needs now and will need in the future. It requires an awareness of the self and the surrounding environments in which the patient has to function.
- Patient's family and staff of health-care facility may prove to be very helpful sources of information regarding issues of a goal formation
Cookie Thief Story from Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Exam (BDAE)
- what is happening in this picture. Is patient able to understand the complexities of the environment and to describe what needs to happen for both the boy and the "mother" to respond to their current situation.
- Description of card: On right side, mother is washing dishes, but fails to see that the sink is overflowing and the water is pouring onto the floor. On the left side behind her back, children are stealing cookies: a boy in the upper left is reaching into a cookie jar to give cookies to himself and his sister who is on the lower left, but at the same time the stool he is standing on is tipping over
- Measures concepts such as
(1) visual perception in each of the four quadrants (upper right & left; lower right & left);
(2) understanding that two different stories are happening (to the mother at the sink and to the children at the cookie jar); and
(3) understanding of the interrelationships between mother & children (they are sneaking the cookies while she is otherwise busy).
3. Planning & Decision Making
- This function refers to the ability of a patient to determine and organize the steps and elements (including procedures and materials) necessary in order to carry out or reach a goal.
- Porteus Maze (simple to very complex mazes): Patient must trace the maze without entering into any blind alleys. While originally designed as a non-verbal test of performance intelligence, this test shows characteristic performance deficits in persons with brain damage including impairments to planning, i.e.., decreased speed and increased errors.
![]()
- WISC: Mazes Subtest
4. Purposive Action = "Translating an intention or a plan into productive, self-serving activity" (Lezak et al., 2012, p. 683)
Tinkertoy Test (Lezak, 1982). Subject is given a standard 50-piece collection of Tinkertoy objects and told to build whatever they want. They have a minimum of 5 minutes (with no upper time limit). Upon completion, they are asked to describe what they built.
5. Impulse Control
The Stroop Color and Word Test (SCWT) = “In the most common version of the SCWT, which was originally proposed by Stroop in the 1935, subjects are required to read three different tables as fast as possible. Two of them represent the “congruous condition” in which participants are required to read names of colors (henceforth referred to as color words) printed in black ink (W) and name different color patches (C).
- Conversely, in the third table, named color-word (CW) condition, color-words are printed in an inconsistent color ink (for instance the word “red” is printed in green ink). Thus, in this incongruent condition, participants are required to name the color of the ink instead of reading the word. In other words, the participants are required to perform a less automated task (i.e., naming ink color) while inhibiting the interference arising from a more automated task (i.e., reading the word). This difficulty in inhibiting the more automated process is called the Stroop effect (Stroop, 1935)” (Scarpina & Tagini, 2017, p. 1)
References
Delis, D. C. (2010). Edith Kaplan (1924-2009) [Obituary]. American Psychologist, 65(2), 127-128. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018250
Diamond, A. (2013) Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135-168. https://10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750
Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B., Bigler, E. D., & Tranel, D. (2012). Neuropsychological assessment (5th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Patterson, H. (2013, October 19) Delis Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) [Prezi presentation]. Accessed at https://prezi.com/x6qkhhclwcpj/delis-kaplan-executive-function-system-d-kefs/
Scarpina, F., & Tagini, S. (2017). The Stroop color and word test. Frontiers in Psychology. https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00557
Silva-Filho, J. H., Pasian, S. R., & Carvalho do Vale, F. A. (2007) Typical performance of elderly patients with Alzheimer disease on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). Dementia & Neuropsychologia, 2, 181-189. https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1980-57642008dn10200011
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0054651