Nov 8, 2025 |
PSY 101
|
|
Conformity and Obedience: Yielding to Others
Were the soldiers involved in the tortures at Abu Ghraib prison in March 2003 in Iraq
somehow "evil" or "bad apples"? Would you or I have done what they did?![]()
![]()
Video Excerpt from CBC The Big Picture | The Human Behaviour Experiments
A. Conformity = people yield to real or imagined social pressure
Question: Would I uphold my own beliefs when others around me disagree strongly?
Asch's Conformity Experiment: 1950s
Results
- Group Size
- Group Unanimity
B. Obedience = a form of compliance in which people respond to the direct commands of someone in authority
Question: Would I torture someone if I was told to do so by someone in authority?
Video of Experiment (5 min., Dutch subtitles)
![]()
![]()
Traditional interpretation: Human beings are willing to follow authority even to the point of harming other people unjustly
Recently social psychologists question this:
- (a) there were multiple variations in Milgram's experiment in which people disobeyed and
- (b) there may be issues of social identification and interpersonal bonding that may also need to be included in how we interpret these results, i.e., people were trying to do the right thing and struggled with their decision.
Designed by Stanford University social psychologist, Philip Zimbardo (b. 1933; d. 2024).
- 24 physically healthy & psychologically well-adjusted students were randomly assigned to play the roles of either "prisoners" or "guards" in a very realistic "prison" set up in the basement of the Psychology Dept. building.
- Scheduled to run for 2-weeks, the experiment was terminated early after 5 days
- The "prisoners" and "guards" very quickly entered into their respective roles.
- Guards became increasingly sadistic as they humiliated and punished prisoners.
- Within 36 hours, the first "prisoner" began showing serious psychological side-effects including crying and withdrawal.
- Explanations
- Social Roles adopted by students
- "The Power of the Situation" overwhelmed the available psychological resources these students had to maintain behavioral standards.
- Criticism
- Not a real "experiment" but a "theater piece" -> No hypothesis being tested.
- Unethical because of unanticipated levels of abuse on "prisoners" by "guards"
- Both "prisoners" and "guards" were following either explicit or implicit "scripts" -- that is, they knew what was expected of them to play-act the roles without having to be told. Many years later, participants told this to interviewers. Yet, given that the participants were hired to play the roles of guards or prisoners, it should not be surprising that they were encouraged to actually play those roles.
- Other participants ("guards") later said that they had been told actually how to act with the "prisoners" by the experimenters including Zimbardo (though he has firmly denied this)
- Only a handful of the "guards" actually acted in a sadistic manner.

This page was originally posted on 11/10/03