Philosophy 302-31                                               Prof. Michael Kagan
Issues in Ethics: Developing                               Office Hours in RH-436
Philosophical Responses to                                 Tuesdays  - 
10:30-11:20 AM
Moral Challenges                                                    and by appointment.
Summer 2005                                                         445-4489 (campus)

Objectives
Three goals of this course are to:

(1) introduce students to philosophical debates on moral problems of
present concern;
(2) present criticisms that will aid students in evaluating some of the
relevant arguments;
(3) help students better develop and defend their own positions.

Texts

Carl Wellman's Morals and Ethics, second edition. Englewood  Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc, 1988.
Orson Scott Card's Maps in a Mirror.
New York: Tom Doherty Associates, Inc., 1990.

Method

We will consider six moral problems and related philosophical ethical issues as follows:

Moral Problem                           Philosophical Ethical Issue

1. Civil Disobedience               The Nature of Right and Wrong
2. Genetic Engineering              The Good
3. Cheating in Academia            Moral Value
4.
Abortion                                The End of the Law
5. Preferential Admissions        "A Right"
6.
Capital Punishment                Moral Knowledge

    These issues will be treated in lectures and discussions as the course progresses. During the discussions students will have an opportunity to make sense out of and criticize other positions, and to develop and
defend their own reasoned conclusions.
    To confirm students' familiarity with the material and the basics of the various positions, a midterm and final exam will be given. In these exams, the student will be asked to defend his or her own position concerning a moral problem discussed in class and a related philosophical issue covered before the exam (not necessarily the issue paired with that problem in class; e.g., on the final exam, the student might be asked to consider whether or not genetic engineering should be legal given the student's own views on the end of the law). ON THE MIDTERM AND FINAL EXAMS, an additional question will be asked concerning an issue raised by Maps in a Mirror.
    The exams are primarily related to the first two objectives of this course concerning criticism of and familiarity with philosophical debates on moral problems of present concern. It is also hoped that preparation for the exams will help students satisfy the third goal of developing and defending their own positions on these and related issues. For those student who wish to do more work in this area. there is an optional paper assignment.

EVALUATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS
    1.
  Attendance and Participation. Attendance is expected. Participation in discussions will figure to the student's benefit in determining grades. ATTENDANCE AND PARTICIPATION TOGETHER COUNT FOR 1/3 OF THE FINAL GRADE.  Grades are based on a 10 point scale as follows:
90-100 - 'A' range (97-100 = A+; 94-96=A; 90-93=A-).
80-89  - 'B' range (87-89 = B+; 84-86=B; 80-83=B-).
70-79  - 'C' range (77-79 = C+; 74-76=C; 70-73=C-).
60-69  - 'D' range (67-69 = D+; 64-66=D; 60-63=D-).
Below 60 - 'F'.

    2.  Exams. Students are expected to be familiar with the material in the lectures, discussions, and the required texts. This familiarity will be evaluated in the midterm (6/30) and cumulative final (in-class on August 4). These each constitute 1/3 of the grade. However, if the final is better, it will be given more weight.
    3.  Extra credit: Each student will be given a chance to develop and defend his or her own position in a paper on one of the moral problems or theoretical issues discussed in this course. Students are encouraged to consider problems not explicitly treated in the course, e.g.:

1. Is war always wrong?
2. Is the use of psychological testimony in the courts on a par with allegations of witchcraft?
3. Should cigarette smoking be illegal?
4. Is cigarette smoking ever justified?
5. Is the use of alcohol (or marijuana or cocaine or . . . ) good or bad?
6. Should men (or women) have a genuinely equal right to work outside the home?
7. Should men (or women) have a genuinely equal right to work inside the home?
8. Is adultery always wrong?
9. The laws on rape should be . . . . . .
10. Ethical Relativism (pro or con).
11. Why be moral?
12. Ethical Egoism (pro or con).
13. Justification in Ethics.
14. Religion and ethics.
15. Is it wrong to eat meat?
16. Animal rights.
17. Should aborted fetuses be used for research or treatment?
18. The obligations of the living to the dying.
19. The obligations of the dying to the living.
20. Should it be legally permissible to produce clones of lost children as replacements?
21.  Would cloning oneself for child-raising purposes produce more good than bad in the long run?
22.  Is it ever morally right to require lie-detector tests for employment?
Other topics.

    Students are encouraged to treat topics of their own choosing. If, however, you decide to do so, please confirm your topic with me in advance. Whatever your topic, please feel free to consult me regarding bibliography, style, or as a devil's advocate.
    Criteria for evaluation of the extra credit paper: The paper is to be a defense of one claim or proposal related to the issue in question. Students should explicitly state the claim they are defending, make a brief case for its importance, develop their arguments carefully, consider objections, show awareness of alternatives and criticisms of their own position. Students are to assume they are not preaching to the converted: The paper should be structured in form and content as if it were being addressed to an audience consisting of the undecided and the reasonable opposition. The paper should be approximately 5-7 pages in length. The paper is to be turned in TWICE, on the dates indicated below. The 1st draft will be graded and given comments that I hope will aid you in the revision. If you are satisfied with the first grade or decide to accept it for some other reason, you have the option of returning the paper "as-is" with its comments on July 27. If you do so, your grade on the paper will be the grade you received on the first draft. If you opt to revise, you will receive the grade of the revision, if higher (and the grade on the draft, if not). NOTE:  IF YOU DECIDE TO DO AN OPTIONAL PRESENTATION OF YOUR FINAL PAPER ON AUGUST 3, YOUR PAPER GRADE WILL BE AT LEAST 2 POINTS HIGHER THAN THE 1ST DRAFT GRADE.  The paper grade will replace the lower of the midterm or final grade. Students who receive a B or better on the paper can choose to accept that grade instead of taking the final exam. 



SPECIAL NEEDS
In coordination with the
Academic Support Center (ASC), reasonable accommodations are provided for qualified students with disabilities. Please register with the ASC Office for disability verification and determination of reasonable accommodations. After receiving your accommodation form from the ASC, you will need to make an appointment with each of us to review the form and discuss your needs. Please make every attempt to meet with us within the first week of class so your accommodations can be provided in a timely manner. You can either stop by the ASC, Library, 1st floor, or email ASC@lemoyne.edu, or call (445-4118-voice or 445-4104-TDD) to make an appointment.



SUMMARY OF EXAM AND DUE DATES
IN-CLASS MIDTERM EXAM: JULY 13 (please note change)
July 13 - FIRST DRAFT OF OPTIONAL PAPER DUE. 
July 27 - 2D DRAFT OF OPTIONAL PAPER
IN-CLASS FINAL EXAM: AUGUST 10

Note : Session III will be on break during the first week of July
(July 1-8).  (See http://www.lemoyne.edu/registrar/acadcal-sum05.htm)

TENTATIVE COURSE SCHEDULE AND READING ASSIGNMENTS
#1 (June 1)  Introduction to the subject.  The usefulness of worrying ahead.  Theory and practice.
#2 (6/8)  Civil Disobedience.  Read Wellman, Chapter 1.  Read Card's "Unaccompanied Sonata."
The Nature of Right and Wrong.  Read Wellman, Chapter 2.
#3 (6/15) Genetic Engineering.  Read Wellman, Chapter 3.  Read Card's "Gert Fram."
 The Good.  Read Wellman, Chapter 4.  Read Card's "The Best Day."
#4(6/22) Are cheaters qua cheaters morally evil?  Read Wellman, Chapter 5.
Moral Value.  Read Wellman, Chapter 6.  Read Card's "The Porcelain Salamander" and "Middle Woman."
#5 (6/29) Abortion.  Read Wellman, Chapter 7.
The End of the Law.  Read Wellman, Chapter 8.  Read Card's "Prior restraint."
* Note : Session III will be on break during the first week of July (July 1-8; see http://www.lemoyne.edu/registrar/acadcal-sum05.htm).
#6 (July 13 ) Review session for midterm exam.  JULY 13: IN-CLASS MIDTERM
 #7 (7/13) Preferential Admissions.  Read Wellman, Chapter 9. Read Card, "Bicicleta."  What is "A Right"?  Read Wellman, Chapter 10. FIRST DRAFT OF OPTIONAL PAPER DUE. 
#8 (7/20) Is Capital Punishment ever right?  Read Wellman, Chapter 11. Read Card's "A Thousand Deaths" and "Sandmagic."
#9 July 27:  2D DRAFT OF OPTIONAL PAPER DUE
How can anyone one ever know which act is right?  Read Wellman, Chapter 12.   Review "Unaccompanied Sonata" and "Middle Woman."   The challenges of ethical skepticism, relativism, emotivism, sophism. Responses to the challenges.  The authoritarian paradox, revelation, intuitionism, naturalism, good reasons approach.  Read Wellman, Conclusion.  Ethical systems and the challenge of science. Determinism and free-will.  Read Rosemarie Tong's article on Feminist Ethics from the on-line Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-ethics/. Ethical systems and codification. Critical theories and feminist critiques.  Theory and practice again.
#10 August 3: Instructor presents on ethics and philosophy of education. OPTIONAL STUDENT PRESENTATIONS OF FINAL PROJECTS. Review session for final exam.
#11 (8/10)    IN-CLASS FINAL. 



Questions, comments, additions, and corrections are welcome.
Please send them to KAGAN@lemoyne.edu